Neptune Apex Disaster (2 Viewers)

[asifiqbal2]

Me personally I have not lost faith in the Apex System overall. In my opinion it is the best controller overall as software drives the control and the user interface drives the ease of use which is both solid in my book. I upgraded my system less than 2 years ago if they offer an improved Outlet upgrade that doesn’t cause this to me in the future I would buy it

 

[Varig]

I guess I have a slightly different philosophy. To me the absolute, number one priority is hardware reliability. Followed closely by a reliable network connection (for notifications of alarm states). And third is user interface/programming.

Yes, the initial set up of the GHL took a little bit to get used to their programming architecture, but now that I understand how to do it, I have not came across something that’s not possible in terms of control scheme. Though I admit, some things are a bit roundabout.

For me, the biggest downside of the GHL is, I don’t think there is any “heartbeat” functionality. It sends me alarms if there’s an alarm, it sends me twice daily emails with my tank conditions. But I think the only way that I would know if the system was off-line is if I did not get one of those twice daily emails. And I don’t feel like getting an email every hour that says “I’m still online.” maybe I’m just missing it, but that’s the one feature that I wish GHL would add.

But beyond that, I believe the hardware is much more robust, at least from everything I’ve been told/read and from my own experience with how heavily built the power bars and dosing heads are.

To each his/her own though